User talk:KwakuNimakoGH

Welcome!

Hello, Exclusive News Plus, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Exclusive News Plus/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
How to write a great article
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Aspening (talk) 03:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exclusive News Plus (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Exclusive News Plus/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Exclusive News Plus/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aspening (talk) 03:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Acroterion (talk) 03:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, Exclusive News Plus. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is for notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. Thank you. EN-Jungwon 05:00, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KwakuNimakoGH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked from editing on wiki. I have read and will abide by your policies set in place. Please am ready and well informed about how you operate. Please the block on my account is not necessary anymore. The block has really affected contributions and I am pleading with you to have a change of mind.

Decline reason:

The block is clearly necessary. If you wish to be unblocked, follow the instructions. Yamla (talk) 10:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KwakuNimakoGH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please I have read your policies and I have learned the do's and don't on this platform. I, therefore, plead with you to reconsider the decision to block my account. I am sorry and I pledge there will not be any form of that mistake again. thank you Exclusive News Plus (talk) 21:16, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted, to be unblocked, please follow the instructions above. You haven't proposed a new username per those instructions, nor have you given a specific explanation as to what was wrong with your edits, and what topics you want to edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 01:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KwakuNimakoGH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have requested for a new username and it has been approved considering that I blocked because of a promotional username and it has now been changed i am pleading for an unblock. Moreover am now familiar with your policies and nothing like that will happen again if am unblock. thank you for your consideration Kwaku Nimako (talk) 15:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Closing - no response from editor about what they would edit if unblocked. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still need to tell us what edits you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 15:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please 331dot can you be a little focused on what am trying to say. I am not editing anything neither was I blocked because of that, I picked a promotional username and due to your policies I was blocked, good I read your policies and I picked a different username and now it is approved and accepted, so now I expect to be reviewed and unblocked since what got me blocked is fixed with no harm and why are you asking me this question "You still need to tell us what edits you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 15:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)" because it's not the reason why I was blocked I never edited any of your articles. please don't broaden the reason why I was blocked. I noticed you are referring me to a page while all am trying to say is clear so please do the same. if am blocked forever just let me know and stop circling me around. thank youKwaku Nimako (talk) 20:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to tell us what you plan to edit, since you will be prohibited from promotional edits. Acroterion (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you have three open unblock requests. This is abusive. Please remove at least two of them. --Yamla (talk) 10:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked for promoting 'Exclusive News Plus . You will not be unblocked to continue to do so. Please describe shat constructive edits you would make. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yes it was an article I wrote for publication about my promotional username not edit please take note and as the username was promotional automatically the article won't be accepted and that's why Acroterion blocked me. I know they are no room for error here and that why these measures are they to keep you in check, I promise nothing of that sort will happen. however the characters I would like to edit is just my new username. Kwaku Nimako (talk) 03:44, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Kwaku Nimako (talk) 03:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the extra unblock request. Please explicitly tell us what you plan to edit. You will not be allowed to make any promotional edits at all, and anything related to Exclusive News Plus will not be accepted. Acroterion (talk) 03:47, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My intention wasn't to edit and now that am blocked because of Exclusive News Plus why would I go back and still edit Exclusive News Plus to get block again. Am just done with Exclusive News Plus. This is so hard is they a number I can call? Cos am blocked for one thing why would I still do what I was blocked for while I have been spending weeks to get unbloked. Kwaku Nimako (talk) 03:59, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding unblock requests. Just tell us what you expect to edit if you are unblocked. This is at least the fourth time we've asked. Acroterion (talk) 04:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kwaku Nimako (talk) 04:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC)I am not going to edit anything it's a hard block on my account and I want it lifted.[reply]

Then there’s no reason to unblock. Acroterion (talk) 11:12, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand after all it's your website, any action you took from the beginning will always stand. thank you.

UTRS 44676

UTRS appeal #44676 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]